|
Egypt Sightseeing by City
Egypt Maps &
Destination
Transportation
in Egypt
Weather in
Egypt
Food
|
Egypt Sculpture:
Producing
the three dimensional world on a two dimensional surface is very
different than working with statuary. In a number of cultures, artists
have found ways by which to obtain the illusion of the third dimension,
adding depth to their work, while in others the two-dimensionality of
the drawing surface has been accepted and even exploited. The ancient
Egyptians belong to this latter group. Rather than attempting to create
the appearance of depth, they instead arranged the objects they wished
to depict over the flat drawing surface. Such objects were drawn using
their most characteristic and easily recognized aspect, usually in
profile, full view, plan or elevation. Because these different views can
occur together in the same picture plane, the result is not rendered as
though from a single viewpoint. Rather, it is a composite assemblage
containing information that can be interpreted by the educated viewer.
The
human figure was usually formed from a composite built up from its
individual parts. Hence, the head may be shown in profile, though with a
full view of the eyebrow and eye set into it. The shoulders of formal
figures are most usually shown frontally, while the waist, buttocks and
limbs are in profile. Normally, the nipple on male figures and the
breast on females are drawn in profile on the front line of the body,
while items that lie on the chest such as collars, necklaces, pectorals
and clothing are shown in full frontal view on the expanse of the torso
framed by the front and back lines of the body. The navel is shown full
view and is placed inside the front line of the body at the appropriate
level. Prior to the 18th Dynasty, the two feet are depicted identically
from the inside, showing the big toe and the arch. Later, the near foot
was increasing shown from the outside with all the toes showing.
Even
when the figures on the walls of Egyptian tombs and temples are acting
out myths, rituals and historical events, they are
nevertheless carved or painted with the stiffness and formality of
hieroglyphs.
The
ancient Egyptians sought order in their world, and it was also
fundamental to their art. Only when the concept of chaos was intended,
were figures placed haphazardly on the drawing surface. Otherwise, they
were set within a system of registers, the lower border of which acted
as the ground line for the figures within the register.
The
position of figures within a scene could be determined by the viewer
according to several rules. Objects could be overlapped within the
register, which means that the object partially covered by another is
farther away. Items higher up in the register are further away than
those lower down. The hierarchical ordering of society was reflected in
both two-dimensional and three-dimensional art by scale. Hence, the
king's figure is usually the same size as the gods whom he interacts
with, though larger than his queen, children or subjects.
Whether
in two or three-dimensions, Egyptian art was usually combined with text.
Short captions might describe the figures depicted and the actions
taking place, while longer texts included requests for offerings for the
dead, hymns to deities, works spoken by deities to the king, etc. The
hieroglyphic texts within any scene typically formed an integral part of
the whole composition. Because the blocks of hieroglyphic texts was
often set against representational elements, the composition would lack
balance without them.
In
fact, hieroglyphs were small images drawn according to the principles
that underlie Egyptian two dimensional art. Nevertheless, the images
often do not resemble the objects that they describe, but are phonetic,
representing different consonantal sounds in the Egyptian language.
However, other hieroglyphs are logographic, representing literally or
metaphorically an object or idea. Interestingly, hieroglyphs can act as
determinatives. That is, they are placed at the ends of individual words
to "determine" a category. For example, the name of a man may be
followed by an image of a man identifying the word as a man's name.
However, so clearly connected is art and hieroglyphs that when a figure
is identified by its name in hieroglyphs, the expected determinative is
usually omitted because the picture the name identifies acts as its
determinative.
Usually, the orientation of scenes in two dimensional art for
hieroglyphs and figures was facing to the right. However, it was not
uncommon for both to also face left, dictated by the circumstances, or
for the hieroglyphs to be written in horizontal lines or vertical
columns. Of course, this allowed for considerable versatility and
subtlety when combining text with depictions. Usually, hieroglyphs faced
the same direction as the figures they refer to, and in fact, the art
was intended to be read like an elaborate code much like the
hieroglyphic text.
The
mediums with which Egyptian artists worked were varied. One of the most
easily obtained was limestone, which composed the cliffs to either side
of much of the Nile Valley. Other common soft stone materials included
calcite (Egyptian Alabaster), a crystalline form of calcium carbonate,
sandstone, schist and greywacke. Harder stones included quartzite (a
crystalline form of sandstone), diorite, granodiorite, granite and
basalt. Stone was almost always used in royal free standing and rock cut
temples and tombs after the earliest periods. It was also used to make
statues, stelae, offering tables, libation bowls, vessels and other
ritual equipment.
Soft
stone, whether cut in place such as a rock cut tomb, or carved into
blocks as in free standing temples, was usually covered by
plaster prior to being decorated. Paint was sometimes also applied to
hard stone, but often it was left visible for its symbolism. Hence,
black stone such as granodiorite was representative of the life giving
black silt left by the Nile inundation, thus symbolizing new life,
resurrection and the resurrected god of he dead, Osiris. Red, brown,
yellow and gold were associated with the sun, and so stones of those
colors, such as red and brown quartzite and red granite, symbolized the
sun. Green stone referred to fresh, growing vegetation, new life,
resurrection and Osiris as well, who sometimes appears with black skin
and sometimes green.
Limestone and other soft stones were carved with copper chisels and
stone tools. Hard stones were worked by hammering and grinding them with
tools made of even harder stone together with sand, which is basically
quartz, acting as an abrasive. Stone vessels were hollowed out using
drills with copper bits, together with an abrasive. These tools were
also used to apply details and inscriptions to hard stone monuments.
Afterwards, the finished object was polished with a smooth rubbing
stone.
If the
stone was to be painted, the surface had to be smoothed and any holes in
the stone or joints between blocks filled in with plaster.
Scenes
on stone surfaces were often cut into relief before painting (or when
not painted at all). There were two main types of reliefs, consisting of
raised and sunk relief. In both, chisels were used to cut around the
outlines of figures. Then, in raised relief, the stone of the background
was cut away, so that the figures were left standing out from the
surface. In sunk relief, it was the figures that were cut back within
their outlines, leaving the surface of the background at a higher level.
In both methods, the figures were modeled to a greater or lesser extent
within their outlines. Traditionally, sunk relief was used on outside
walls and raised relief on interior walls, because bright sunlight has
the effect of flattening raised relief and enhancing sunk relief. It
should be noted that such work could also be applied to plastered
surfaces on soft stone.
In
Theban tombs which were often simply painted, as opposed to relief-cut,
rock cut walls, the walls were first covered with mud that was then
plastered before painting. Treated similarly to soft stone, mudbrick was
used in houses, palaces and other public buildings. And like the walls
in Theban tombs, the mud was prepared for decoration with a layer of
plaster.
Prior
to actually painting the prepared surfaces of stone or plaster over
stone or mudbrick, scenes were laid out by first marking off the area to
be decorated and then drawing in the initial sketches in red, to which
corrections were often made in black, probably by the master draughtsman
in charge of the project. Squared grids were introduced at the beginning
of the Middle Kingdom. Used to assist the artist in obtaining the proper
proportions of their figures and often also to lay out the composition
as a whole, the grids were drawn out on the surface before the scene was
sketched in. The lines of the grid were either drawn against a straight
edge, or more commonly made with a string that was dipped in red paint
and stretched taut across the surface before being snapped against it
like a modern chalk line.
The
sketches were drawn with brushes, similar to those that were used by
scribes. They were made from fine reeds that were trimmed at one end to
an angle and chewed or split to fray the fibers. For the actual
application of paint, thicker brushes were made from fibrous wood such
as palm ribs, or from bundles of twigs tied together that were than
beaten at one end to separate the fibers and make a course brush.

A bundle of brushes wrapped round with string used for making grid lines
Pigments for
paint came primarily from minerals that occur naturally in Egypt and the
surrounding desert. White was usually made from calcium carbonate
(whiting) or calcium sulphate (gypsum). However, huntite, which was
already in use during the Middle Kingdom, and which became common during
the New Kingdom, produced a more intense white. It was frequently used
to paint white areas, such as clothing, so that it would stand out
against the less white background of calcium carbonate.
Black
was produced from one of several forms of carbon, most commonly soot or
charcoal.
Ochre
(iron oxide) could produce a range of colors from light yellow to dark
brown depending on the level of hydration. It was frequently used for
reds and yellows.
During
the New Kingdom, realgar was also used for red, but is unstable in
light, and has often degraded over time to yellow. Orpiment was used
from the Middle Kingdom onward to obtain a very bright yellow that was
used to simulate gold. However, it fades in light to a dull off-white so
that its effect is often lost. Jarosite was also used to produce a pale
yellow. The artists used different yellow pigments side by side, showing
that they were not mere substitutes for each other.
Blue
was sometimes provided from azurite (copper carbonate), which over time
becomes green as it changes to malachite, another
form of copper carbonate. However, Egyptian blue was more common, which
consisted of a compound made from heating quartz, ground malachite and
calcium carbonate together. Different shades of blue were obtained
according to the way in which the resulting compound was ground for use,
since the finer the grain the paler the blue. Green rather than blue
could be produced if the proportions of malachite and calcium carbonate
were varied. However, green was more frequently made from naturally
occurring malachite. Sometimes, the pigments were mixed together to make
different colors prior to application. For example, black might be mixed
with white to obtain gray, or red and white to make pink.
Pigments were prepared by grinding them on a hard stone mortar before
mixing them with a medium such as plant gum or animal glue.
Paint
was laid on in flat washes, pigment by pigment, so that painters mixed
as much of one color as they needed, painted in all the appropriate
areas, and then moved on to another color. However, colors could also be
painted over one another in layers to obtain different color effects.
The final stage of painting was to outline figures and add interior
details with a fine brush. Many details in relief work and on statues
were often only added in paint and not cut into the stone.
No
discussion of stone art would be complete without reference to Ostracons,
rock fragments that were used for various purposes. They were generally
discarded fragments, which were frequently used to draw plans and sketch
out drawings. However, some of the most interesting artwork ever
produced in Egypt were recorded on their small surfaces, usually by
craftsman, but also by anyone else. They were the scratchpads of ancient
Egypt, used by the common man to do the ancient equivalent of doodling.
As such, there were no real rules that applied and so we find a
completely unique art form known perhaps no where else in Egypt other
than perhaps the graffiti drawn on the faces of cliffs.
|